Washington state officials surrendered their fight to force Christian foster parents to embrace gender ideology, agreeing to a permanent injunction that protects families from being required to affirm gender transition beliefs as a condition of caring for children in need.
Court Blocks State’s Religious Discrimination
District Court Judge David Estudillo issued a permanent injunction barring Washington’s Department of Children, Youth, and Families from denying or conditioning foster care licenses based solely on religious beliefs about marriage, gender, or sexual relationships. The ruling represents a decisive victory for Shane and Jennifer DeGross, who fought state officials since 2022 after being told their foster care license would only be renewed if they agreed to use gender transition language.
The couple took their case to federal court in 2024 after state officials issued their ultimatum. Judge Estudillo determined the state’s demand likely violated First Amendment protections for religious expression and practice. Alliance Defending Freedom represented the family throughout the legal battle, arguing that foster care systems need diverse families willing to serve vulnerable children.
Religious Freedom vs State Ideology
Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse emphasized that the DeGross family simply wanted to care for foster children without compromising their deeply held religious convictions. He noted that state officials do not need to share the family’s beliefs to recognize the benefit of including them in the foster care system and welcoming them to help children who desperately need stable homes.
The permanent injunction establishes clear boundaries preventing state agencies from imposing ideological requirements on families seeking to provide foster care. Washington officials attempted to make acceptance of gender ideology a mandatory condition for participation in the state’s foster care program, effectively excluding families whose religious beliefs conflict with progressive gender theories.
Implications for Foster Care System
The ruling addresses growing concerns about states prioritizing ideological conformity over the welfare of children in foster care systems already facing severe shortages of qualified families. Washington state now cannot exclude foster parents solely because their religious beliefs about human sexuality and gender differ from state-promoted ideology. The decision protects the rights of faith-based families to participate in foster care without being forced to violate their conscience as a condition of serving vulnerable children who need loving homes.
